EBaR Insights provides information on EBaR issues and applications.
The following items are taken from the Preface of Energy Budgets at Risk:
A Risk Management Approach to Energy Purchase and Efficiency Choices
(John Wiley , March 2008).
What Exactly is EBaR Analysis?
EBaR analysis develops and applies a series of equations describing
your facility's energy use and operating characteristics. These equations
are combined with weather data and energy price forecasts with a widely used
software process called Monte Carlo analysis. Graphical and tabular outputs
provide representations of risks and returns for any energy efficiency
investment. EBaR analysis also incorporates energy purchase options for
facilities in competitive energy markets.
How Much Can I Save?
A brief detour to the Appendix of Energy Budgets at Risk: A Risk
Management Approach to Energy Purchase and Efficiency Choices (John Wiley
, March 2008) provides information to assess potential energy and financial
benefits of an EBaR analysis. The appendix provides excerpts from MAISY ®
facility energy use data (http://www.maisy.com) on more than one million
business, institutional, and government buildings. Data are detailed by business
type and operating hours. Using these data, readers can calculate several
energy use statistics for their facility and compare them to data on similar
facilities to see how much energy use can be reduced. Applying your electric
prices and natural gas prices provides a general indication of the financial
rewards associated with an EBaR strategy. While these calculations are only
general estimates, they provide a reasonable basis for determining the value
of an EBaR application at your facility.
Detailed Case Study Examples
All concepts and applications are illustrated in the book with a detailed
case study application to an Austin, Texas office building. Monthly facility
energy use data, Austin weather data, and other facility data are used to
illustrate concepts, data development, equation parameter estimation, and
application in EBaR analysis. Readers can substitute data for their facilities
and use each of the steps in Chapters 810 as a template for their own
EBaR analysis.
What Software Is Required?
Excel software was used to develop all required data relationships
and characterizations in the book. Each of the data development steps is
described in detail in Chapter 8 along with documentation of required Excel
menu options.
Monte Carlo software applies the relationships and data developed
with Excel software to generate distributions of efficiency investment risks
and returns. Monte Carlo software is used in all financial risk management
applications and is available in a variety of commercial software
packages.
The Monte Carlo process is described in Chapter 7. Many of these software
packages are Excel add-ins, permitting Excel to serve as the software platform
for the data development,Monte Carlo analysis, and output tables and
graphs.
All of the tables and graphs used in Chapters 9 through 12 to present
the case study results were developed using Excel.
EBaR Energy risk management software
customized to support all aspects of EBaR analysis is
also available at this site.
Is an EBaR Strategy Right for Your Organization?
EBaR is a compelling application. Common sense says that managing
risks is a more profitable strategy than avoiding risks. Incorporating risk
in traditional investment analysis by using short paybacks or high internal
rate of return thresholds avoids rather than manages risk. The evidence is
overwhelming that nearly every business, institution, and government agency
can reduce energy bills with cost-effective energy-efficiency
investments.
Is It Worth the Effort?
Every new initiative incurs a cost. Is developing an EBaR analysis
and strategy likely to be a good investment of time and resources for your
organization?
Energy Savings. As indicated in the previous section, the book's
Appendix, which provides information on energy use characteristics of over
one million facilities,can be used to benchmark your current energy use to
other facilities in your business and operating hours category. Your energy
use compared to the more efficient facilities represented in the tables provides
a good indication of potential efficiency savings.
Efficiency Investments as a New Revenue Source. Energy savings
developed from information in the Appendix are multiplied by the average
price of electricity and natural gas to estimate potential savings in energy
costs. When the cost of the investment is amortized over the lifetime of
the equipment, these investments nearly always increase cash flow. That is,
the value of energy savings more than offsets the cost of financing.
Efficiency investments can be viewed as generating a new revenue or
income stream. Lease and lease purchase financing offered by energy service
companies, manufacturers and financial organizations described in Chapter
3 support this income-enhancing strategy.
Is My Facility Big Enough? Because EBaR is a scalable application,
the answer to this question is an unequivocal yes. Anyone considering reading
this book is concerned enough about energy costs to invest at least a minimal
effort to manage those costs. EBaR scalability means that small organizations
can apply the process to evaluate the simplest and most promising efficiency
investments first and then extend the analysis over time.
Organization Type. Organizations differ in their management
and decision-making structure, budget flexibility, and risk tolerance.
Commercial, institutional, industrial, and government agencies face different
constraints and options in considering energy budget risks, efficiency
investments, and energy purchase decisions. The EBaR framework applies equally
to all organization types. Budget flexibility and risk tolerance are parameters
of the analysis specified by users. EBaR strategic choices reflect budget
and risk characteristics of individual users.
From Do-It-Yourself to Turnkey Projects. EBaR analysis provides
value regardless of the extent to which efficiency projects are self-performed
by an organization. Organizations who conduct their own analysis, make their
own equipment purchases, and self-perform or contract for installation should
certainly have a detailed understanding of EBaR concepts and
applications.
Organizations at the other end of the spectrum, who contract out analysis,
engineering, financing, and other efficiency tasks, should have an equally
thorough understanding of EBaR. For instance, performance contracts require
energy service companies to conduct all tasks associated with energy-efficiency
investmentsfrom analysis to monitoring savings of the installed equipment.
Performance contracts also guarantee energy savings and commit energy service
companies to make reimbursements for savings that fall short of the guaranteed
amount. While this approach would seem to offer a risk-free option to achieve
improved energy efficiency, performance contracts can suffer from either
underinvestment or overinvestment in efficient technologies. In addition,
efficiency improvements achieved under performance contracts may do little
to reduce energy budget volatilityan important consideration for government
agencies and institutions whose only option to addressing higher energy costs
is to reduce services.
Energy managers or contract officers with responsibility for performance
contractor selection and contract negotiation should conduct their own energy
risk management analysis or require vendors to present the results of EBaR
analysis to evaluate competing bids and to insure that contractors meet the
needs of the organization.
Going Green, Carbon Foot-prints and EBaR
The list of companies, municipalities, institutions, and other
organizations publicly committing to carbon reductions and other green policies
is growing by the day. The primary opportunity to meet these environmental
goals is through energy efficiency investments that reduce energy use.
Many organizations reluctant to undertake carbon-reducing initiatives
assume these actions will increase operating costs, resulting in reduced
earnings or, for government and nonprofit organizations, a reduced level
of services. Energy Budgets at Risk shows that carbon and other greenhouse
gas emissions can be reduced with energy cost savings more than offsetting
the cost of energy-efficiency investments. Thus, achieving carbon-reducing
goals with EBaR analysis can add to the financial bottom line.
New carbon-trading mechanisms established both by government and private
interests and the growing use of "efficiency certificates" in individual
states pass incentives to reduce energy use through to individual facility
owners. For instance, efficiency certificates permit individual facility
owners to sell efficiency improvement credits to utilities who are required
to meet requirements of "efficiency portfolio standards." These market mechanisms
provide additional financial incentives to invest in energy efficiency.
The EBaR analytical framework is ideally suited to integrate carbon
reduction and other green objectives in a capital budgeting approach that
comprehensively considers benefits, costs, and risks associated with energy
efficiency investments.
|