|
|
Energy Budgets at Risk: A Risk Management Approach to Energy Purchase
and Efficiency Choices, published by John Wiley in March 2008 is
for a nontechnical audience. The material is directly
relevant to actual decisions faced by facility energy managers,financial
managers and executives in business, institutions, and government.
Concepts and applications are introduced and described in sufficient
detail to support applications at individual
facilities.
Energy Budgets at Risk provides background information required
to understand the various energy cost, price, efficiency,
and related issues that are important in developing a balanced
approach to facility energy risk management. Analytical concepts
are limited, and sufficient background material is included
to explain and illustrate all applications.
This book is designed to serve five separate but related audiences
with whom I have interacted over the last 30 years.
The first group is composed of building owners,
facility managers, and others on the front line who
are responsible for electric, natural gas, and fuel oil budgets in
commercial, industrial, government, and institutional buildings
and facilities. This audience will learn how to develop,
apply and present a comprehensive, consistent financial risk
management framework to evaluate energy budget risk, alternative
energy-efficiency investments, and, in competitive markets,
how to integrate efficiency investment decisions with purchase
decisions.
The second audience is composed of CEOs, CFOs, CROs (chief
risk officers), administrators, and managers whose organizations
have already begun adopting quantitative management approaches in other areas
such as Six Sigma quality measurement.
For these decision makers, Energy Budgets
at Risk provides another tool in the expanding portfolio of management
analytics. For organizations just beginning to consider quantitative
options for measuring and managing risk, Energy Budgets at
Risk provides a perfect starting point. An energy budget
and efficiency investment application provides an intuitive
introduction to modern risk management concepts and tools,
and, additionally provides immediate cash flow benefits.
The third audience, energy service companies (ESCOs), MEPs
(mechanical, electrical and plumbing firms), consulting
engineers, architects, and other design professionals
who provide energy-efficiency services, typically
struggles to present efficiency options to their clients. More efficient
choices nearly always cost more initially but with proper
financing will increase cash flows. However, many owners
feel uncomfortable with anything other than the traditional
least-cost option. An EBaR analysis intuitively demonstrates
that making a trade-off between initial cost and future energy budgets
will better meet owner objectives.
The fourth audience is government policy makers and electric
utilities program planners. Simply providing
consumers with energy-efficiency technology information and
encouraging them to use traditional investment evaluations
like net present value analysis have relatively little impact on
efficiency-investment decisions. Energy Budgets at Risk tackles this
problem by providing policy makers and program planners with
a new investment analysis tool that can be bundled with energy-efficient
technology information to increase the impact of current
information programs. Promoting EBaR and other new information
initiatives that better fit existing decisionmaking requirements
is a promising approach to encourage greater energy
efficiency.
The final audience includes advanced undergraduate and graduate
university students. Energy Budgets at Risk provides the
financial framework to evaluate energy efficiency and green
building choices required in architectural design, construction, facilities
management, and mechanical engineering disciplines. Also,
students in business, finance, and industrial engineering
will find Energy Budgets at Risk instructive as an introduction to
quantitative risk management applications to evaluate market
risks and capital budgeting investment decisions.
|
|